November 15, 2020

Hello LeetCode enthusiasts 👋! It’s time to look the nineteenth problem from LeetCode.

Given the ** head** of a linked list, remove the

Follow up: Could you do this in one pass?

The number of nodes in the list is `sz`

.

- 1 ≤
`sz`

≤ 30 - 0 ≤
`Node.val`

≤ 100 - 1 ≤
`n`

≤`sz`

Example 1:

```
Input: head = [1,2,3,4,5], n = 2
Output: [1,2,3,5]
```

Example 2:

```
Input: head = [1], n = 1
Output: []
```

Example 3:

```
Input: head = [1,2], n = 1
Output: [1]
```

We are given a linked list and a number `n`

, and we are required to remove the ** n^{th}** from the end of the list. Since we are removing the

Once we remove the node, we need to return the head of the modified list.

The intuitive approach can be like that — move to the end of the list and then count `n`

nodes backwards. This works but since the given linked list is a singly linked list (where previous pointer is not present), therefore, we need to maintain the previous pointer in every step.

Also, this approach requires two traversals of the linked list, which is an overkill.

So, do we have another way to solve this? Of course, we have 😄 using **Two Pointer Technique**.

This technique is used to solve multiple linked list problems. In this, we use two pointers, **slow** and **fast**. The fast pointer sometimes —

- Move faster than the slow pointer (two steps at a time, for example)
- Move ahead of the slow pointer with same speed (
`n`

steps ahead, for example)

This problem also requires usage of two pointer technique where both pointers move with same speed but fast pointer is `n`

steps ahead of slow pointer.

Imagine there are two bikers both riding Lightning LS-218 at top speed (which is 351 km/h 😲) but from different points A and B 100 km apart (B = 100 + A). Assuming they are riding with same speed then when the biker who started from A travelled 200 km, the biker would also have travelled 200 km but would be at 300 km mark (100 + 200).

We can assume biker at A as slow pointer and biker at B as fast pointer (not that A’s speed is slow but it is behind 100 km).

Applying the same logic here, we can follow below steps —

- Initialize two pointers
`slow`

and`fast`

, pointing to the`head`

of the linked list. - Move
`fast`

pointer n steps ahead. - Now, move both
`slow`

and`fast`

one step at a time unless fast reaches to the end. The`fast`

pointer will definitely reach to the end before`slow`

because it is ahead. - When we
`fast`

pointer reaches to the end, the`slow`

pointer will be`n`

steps behind it i.e.,`n`

steps behind the end of the list. - At that point, we will remove the node and link it to the next of current node.

Thus, we only have to traverse the list only once which is more efficient.

We are traversing the list only once, hence the time complexity is ** O(n)**, where

`n`

is the number of nodes in the list.We are not using any data structure for intermediate calculation, hence the space complexity will be ** O(1)**.

```
public class RemoveNthNodeFromEndOfList {
public ListNode removeNthFromEnd(ListNode head, int n) {
// Two pointers - fast and slow
ListNode slow = head;
ListNode fast = head;
// Move fast pointer n steps ahead
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (fast.next == null) {
// If n is equal to the number of nodes, delete the head node
if (i == n - 1) {
head = head.next;
}
return head;
}
fast = fast.next;
}
// Loop until we reach to the end.
// Now we will move both fast and slow pointers
while (fast.next != null) {
slow = slow.next;
fast = fast.next;
}
// Delink the nth node from last
if (slow.next != null) {
slow.next = slow.next.next;
}
return head;
}
static class ListNode {
int val;
ListNode next;
ListNode(int val) {
this.val = val;
}
}
}
```

```
class ListNode:
def __init__(self, val=0, next=None):
self.val = val
self.next = next
def removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode, n: int) -> ListNode:
# Two pointers - fast and slow
slow = head
fast = head
# Move fast pointer n steps ahead
for i in range(0, n):
if fast.next is None:
# If n is equal to the number of nodes, delete the head node
if i == n - 1:
head = head.next
return head
fast = fast.next
# Loop until fast node reaches to the end
# Now we will move both slow and fast pointers
while fast.next is not None:
slow = slow.next
fast = fast.next
# Delink the nth node from last
if slow.next is not None:
slow.next = slow.next.next
return head
```

```
var removeNthFromEnd = function (head, n) {
// Two pointers - fast and slow
let slow = head;
let fast = head;
// Move fast pointer n steps ahead
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (fast.next === null) {
// If n is equal to the number of nodes, delete the head node
if (i === n - 1) {
head = head.next;
}
return head;
}
fast = fast.next;
}
// Loop until we reach to the end.
// Now we will move both fast and slow pointers
while (fast.next !== null) {
slow = slow.next;
fast = fast.next;
}
// Delink the nth node from last
if (slow.next !== null) {
slow.next = slow.next.next;
}
return head;
};
function ListNode(val, next) {
this.val = (val === undefined ? 0 : val)
this.next = (next === undefined ? null : next)
}
```

```
fun removeNthFromEnd(head: ListNode?, n: Int): ListNode? {
// Two pointers - fast and slow
var newHead: ListNode? = head
var slow = newHead
var fast = newHead
// Move fast pointer n steps ahead
for (i in 0 until n) {
if (fast?.next == null) {
// If n is equal to the number of nodes, delete the head node
if (i == n - 1) {
newHead = newHead!!.next
}
return newHead
}
fast = fast.next
}
// Loop until we reach to the end.
// Now we will move both fast and slow pointers
while (fast?.next != null) {
slow = slow!!.next
fast = fast.next
}
// Delink the nth node from last
if (slow?.next != null) {
slow.next = slow.next!!.next
}
return newHead
}
internal class ListNode(val `val`: Int) {
var next: ListNode? = null
}
```

Congratulations 👏! We have solved the problem using ** two pointer technique** which is very handy in solving a variety of linked list problems.

I hope you enjoyed this post. Feel free to share your thoughts on this.

You can find the complete source code on my GitHub repository. If you like what you learn, feel free to fork 🔪 and star ⭐ it.

Till next time… Happy coding 😄 and Namaste 🙏!